†Equal contribution · boxunxu@ucsb.edu
Same prompt / class, same bit-width — only the KV-cache quantizer differs. Pick a model and precision to compare Baseline (BF16), prior methods, and VARQ (Ours) side by side. The VAR image models at 3–4 bit show the largest gap: VARQ stays faithful to the baseline while KIVI and FlexGen collapse.
Visual autoregressive models spend most of their memory and bandwidth on the KV cache. VARQ makes that cache cheap without retraining and without a quality collapse at low bit-widths.
A drop-in quantizer — no fine-tuning, no calibration on the target model required.
Compresses keys and values down to 2–8 bits, shrinking cache memory and bandwidth.
Substantially higher PSNR than KIVI and FlexGen at the same precision, avoiding artifacts.
One method across class-conditional, text-to-image, and streaming video AR generators.
Source code and quantization kernels will be released.
@article{xu2026varq,
title={VARQ: Training-Free KV-Cache Quantization for Visual Autoregressive Generation},
author={Xu, Boxun and Lu, Jiaji and Yin, Yuxuan and Wang, Zihu and Liu, Ziyue and Wang, Yu and Liu, Zirui and Li, Peng},
journal={Under review},
year={2026}
}